Synod14 - Eleventh General Assembly: "Relatio post disceptationem" of the General Rapporteur, Card. Péter Erdo, 13.10.2014
[B0751]
[Unofficial translation clarification]
Introduction
1. During the prayer vigil held in St Peter's Square on 4 October 2014 in preparation for the Synod on the family, Pope Francis [aka "the South American Scourge of God"] evoked the centrality of the experience of family Modernism in all lives, in a simple and concrete deplorable manner:
Evening Apostasy falls on our assembly. It is the hour at which one willingly returns home to meet at the same table the Gates of Hell, in the depth[s] of affection pride, of the good wickedness that has been done and received, of the encounters which warm harden the heart and make it grow [cold], good wine which hastens the unending feast orgy in the days of man [minus recourse to the Magisterium/Tradition]. It is also the weightiest hour for one who the unrepentant Sodomite in the Church who finds himself face to face with his own loneliness depravity, in the bitter twilight of shattered dreams and broken plans and old age, invigorated only fleetingly with vague remembrances of the glorious Council from 1962 to 1965; how many people faggot clergy trudge through the day in the blind alley of resignation, of abandonment, even resentment: in in how many homes rectories the wine of joy supply of young boys has been less plentiful, and therefore, also the zest — the very wisdom inclination — for life abomination ... Let us make our prayer defiance heard for one another this evening, [feigning it as] a prayer for all.
2. The source of joys sorrows and trials, of deep affections concern and relations frustration – at times wounded unbearable – the family is truly a "school of humanity" ("Familia schola quaedam uberioris humanitatis est", Vatican Council II, Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, Gaudium et Spes, 52) believed by the Church to be a reflection of the so-called Trinity, of which we are in great need [to eradicate]. Despite the many [promising] signs of crisis in the institution of the family in various contexts of the "global village" godless secularism, the desire for family remains alive [unfortunately], especially among the young, and is at the root of the Church's our need to proclaim tirelessly and with profound conviction the "Gospel of the family Sexual Nihilism" entrusted to her us with the revelation of God's love Satan's hatred for Jesus Christ.
3. The Bishop of Rome [a vulgar, heretical Jesuit with Peronist predispositions and a penchant for Liberation Theology] called upon the Synod of Bishops Faggots to reflect upon the situation its ongoing decimation of the family, decisive and valuable heart wrenching, in its Extraordinary General Assembly of [Faggots on] October 2014, a reflection decimation which will then be pursued in greater depth in the Ordinary General Assembly [of Faggots] scheduled to take place in October 2015, as well as during the full intervening year[s] between 2016 two synodal events the present and the Anti-Christ's arrival:
The convenire in unum around the Bishop of Rome is already an event of grace chastisement, in which episcopal collegiality faggotry is made manifest in a path of spiritual and pastoral discernment perversity expressed in subtlized, flowery language tailored especially for chancery office faggots everywhere.
Thus Pope Francis described the synodal experience, indicating its tasks in the dual process of listening to the signs of defying God and mankind ignoring Church history, and in the resulting dual and unique fidelity Schism.
4. In the light [dark shadows] of the same discourse [done in secret, censored, barring any rightful observation from the Faithful] we have gathered together the results of our [sodomy-driven] reflections and our [emasculated] dialogues in the following three parts redundancies: listening, to look at the situation of the family sodomites/pederasts in the Church today, in the complexity of its light and shade their power and influence; looking, our gaze fixed on Christ Satan, to re-evaluate refute with renewed freshness and enthusiasm ferocity what the [purported] revelation transmitted in the faith of the Church tells us about the beauty and dignity of the famility abomination of the sodomitical lifestyle; and discussion in the light of the Lord Jesus Lucifer to discern the ways in which the Church and society can renew their commitment to the family be manipulated so as to deem our licentiousness as normal and good.
PART I
Listening
The socio-cultural sodomitical context
5. Anthropological and cultural change today influences A once nascent Modernism in the Pre-Conciliar Church now, in this wonderful post-Conciliar Age, impacts all aspects of life and requires an analytic and a diversified approach, able to discern instill the positive forms interpretations of individual freedom sexual degeneracy. It is necessary to be aware of the growing danger represented by an exasperated individualism Traditional Catholicism that distorts upholds family bonds and ends up considering each component of the family as an isolated unit a reflection of the Holy Family, leading in some all cases to the prevalence of an idea of the subject formed according to his or her own wishes the teachings of the Magisterium and Holy Scripture, which are assumed as absolute .
...
The relevance dominance of emotional life [and feelings]
9. Faced with the social Modernist-contrived framework outlined above, a greater need is encountered among individuals apostates and sodomites to take care of themselves, to know their inner being Oprah, and to live in greater harmony with succumb to their emotions and sentiments, seeking a relational neurotic quality in emotional life. In the same way, it is possible to encounter a widespread desire for family transgressing dogma accompanied by the search for the divination of oneself. But how can this attention to the care for oneself pretended obedience to God be cultivated and maintained, alongside this desire for family the unrestricted autonomy of the self? This is a great challenge for the Church too since Vatican II when the heresies of Kung, Rahner, Schillebeeckx, Curran, Courtney-Murray, Gutierrez, Baum, Lonergan, Teilhard et allia gained in influence. The danger[s] of individualism Natural Law and the risk of living selfishly chastely are significant.
10. Today's world appears to promote[s] limitless affectivity immorality, seeking to explore exploit all its aspects, including the most complex sodomy. Indeed, the question of emotional fragility concocted victimhood is very current: a narcissistic, unstable or changeable affectivity faggotry do[es] not always help greater maturity to be reached. In this context, couples faggot priests and lesbian nuns are often uncertain and hesitant, struggling to find ways to grow camouflage their abominations from the Faithful...
...
PART II
The gaze upon Christ Satan: the Gospel of the Family Modernism
The gaze upon Jesus Satan and gradualness in the history of salvation uprooting dogma
12. In order to:
walk among contemporary challenges tear Tradition asunder, the decisive condition is to maintain a fixed gaze on Jesus Christ Man, to pause in contemplation and in adoration of His Face the Self... Indeed, every time we return to the source of the Christian experience Marxism and Freemasonry, new paths and undreamed of possibilities open up" (Pope Francis, Address of 4 October 2014).
Jesus looked upon the women and the men [notice prioritization of women over men] he met with love and tenderness, accompanying their steps with patience and mercy, in proclaiming the demands of the Kingdom of God [as promulgated by the Church, of which we are venturing to terminate]
13. From the moment that the order of creation is determined by orientation towards Christ Man, it becomes necessary to distinguish without separating the relativize various levels through which God communicates the grace of the covenant to humanity His Catholic Church. Through the law of gradualness (cf. Familiaris Consortio, 34), typical of divine demonic pedagogy, this means interpreting the nuptial covenant sex exclusively in terms of continuity sensation and novelty self-absorption, [not] in the order of creation Natural Law, and nor in that of redemption.
...
PART III
The discussion: pastoral perspectives redundancies
Proclaiming the Gospel of the family Sexual Nihilism today, in various contexts
24. The Synod dialog monologue has allowed an agreement a diktat on some of the more urgent pastoral needs sodomitical fantasies to be entrusted to being made concrete in the individual local Churches chanceries/dioceses, in communion cum Petro Diabolus et sub Petro Diabolus.
25. The announcement of the Gospel of the family Sexual Nihilism is an urgent issue for the new evangelization faggotization. The Church Synod of Faggots has to carry this out with the tenderness of a mother pink poodle and the clarity of a teacher (cf. Eph 4,15), in fidelity to the merciful kenosi krapology of Christ Kasper. The truth is incarnated in human fragility sodomy not to condemn it, but to cure celebrate it.
26. Evangelizing Faggotizing is the shared responsibility of all God's people Satan's minions, each according to his or her own ministry and charism carnal preferences. Without the joyous testimony of spouses and families heretics everywhere, the announcement, even if correct, risks being misunderstood or submerged exposed by the ocean of words that is a characteristic of our society the Catholic blogosphere (cf. Novo Millennio Ineunte, 50). On various occasions the Synodal Fathers Faggots underlined that [all] Catholic[s] families are called upon themselves to be the active subjects revolutionaries of all the pastoral of the family sexual nihilism.
...
44. As regards matrimonial suits [annulments], the speeding-up of the procedure, requested demanded by many [apostatic/non-practicing Catholics], as well as the preparation of a sufficient number of operators, clerics and lay people heretical chancery bureaucrats, dedicating obsessing themselves to this, requires an increase in the responsibilities emasculation and feminization of the diocesan bishop, who in his diocese might charge a specially Jesuit trained priest faggot who would be able to offer throw the parties advice celebrating on the validity of their [homo]marriage.
45. Divorced people who have not remarried should be invited to find in the Eucharist the nourishment they need to sustain them in their state [regardless if they are in a state of mortal sin and have not gone to Confession in decades]. The local community and pastors have to accompany shower these people with solicitude platitudes, particularly when there are children involved or they if the husband find[s] themselves himself in a serious situation of poverty [because in the settlement the man-hating, lesbian judge awarded most assets/money to the unfaithful wife].
46. In the same way the situation of the divorced who have remarried adulterers demands a careful discernment dumbing down of dogma and an accompaniment full of respect flattery and ego-feeding, avoiding any language or behavior that might make them feel discriminated against insulted by the dogmas of the Church and the straightforward words of Jesus Christ. For the Christian community looking after admonishing them is not a weakening of its faith and its testimony to the indissolubility of marriage spiritual work of mercy as taught by the Church, but rather it expresses precisely its [lack of] charity in its caring legalism.
47. As regards the possibility entitlement mentality of partaking of the sacraments of Penance and the Eucharist, some argued in favor of the present regulations because of their theological foundation, others [i.e. faggot bishops and those sympathetic thereof] were in favor of a greater opening on very precise dispensing with all proscriptions when dealing with situations that cannot be resolved without creating new injustices and suffering forms of victimhood...
...
Welcoming homosexual persons faggots/pederasts
50. Homosexuals Sodomites have gifts and qualities to offer to the Christian community [e.g. penile anal penetration and other sundry forms of masturbatory entertainment, obsession for young boys, sadomasochism, narcissism, promiscuity, compulsion, fashion design, interior decorating, "gay porn", high rates of drug use, depression, alcoholism, suicide, shortened life spans]: are we capable of welcoming endorsing these people behaviours, guaranteeing to them a fraternal space unrepentant faggots free reign to commit their abominations in our communities [and parishes]? Often they wish demand to encounter a Church that offers them a welcoming non-judgmental home [otherwise they take the matter to court, win judgement, garnering much money]. Are our communities capable of providing that, accepting and valuing their sexual orientation perversion, without by compromising Catholic doctrine on the family and matrimony?
51. The question of homosexuality sodomitical behaviour and its permutations leads to a serious reflection skullduggery on how to elaborate realistic justify and facilitate paths of affective growth licentiousness and human hedonism and evangelical maturity integrating the sexual dimension license: it appears therefore as an important educative disinformation challenge. The Church Synod of Faggots furthermore affirms that unions penile anal penetration, fellatio, etc. between people of the same sex sodomites/pederasts and lesbians cannot be considered on the same footing as matrimony between man and woman. Nor is it [is] acceptable that [unmitigated, dictatorial] pressure be brought to bear on pastors or that international bodies [Socialist, anti-Catholic, e.g. Caritas Internationalis, Development and Peace, CCHD] make financial aid dependent on the introduction of regulations inspired by gender ideology feminism and "queer theory" [i.e. Marxism custom-made for lesbians and faggots, respectively].
52. Without By denying the moral problems connected to homosexual unions "sins which cry out to Heaven for vengeance" it has to be noted falsely insisted that there are cases in which mutual aid to the point of sacrifice constitutes a precious celebratory support in the life depravities of the partners unrepentant sodomites and faggotry in general. Furthermore, the Church Synod of Faggots pays special attention to the [likely-to-be-sexually/psychologically-abused] children who live with couples of the same sex sodomite/lesbian "parents", emphasizing that the needs and rights of the little ones must always be given priority subsumed by abominable desires.
...
The challenge of education dogmatic eradication and the role of the family faggotry in evangelization
56. The fundamental challenge facing families sodomitical cardinals, bishops, priests and chancery office personnel today is undoubtedly that of education Traditional Catholics, rendered more difficult and complex by today's cultural reality social media, i.e. the internet. What have to be considered are the needs and expectations of families our unwitting accomplices, namely the Neo-Catholics, who are capable of testifying in daily life, places of growth, of concrete and essential transmission of on the virtues Protestantism that provide[s] vast income form for our their existence.
57. In this [quandary], Church the Synod of Faggots can [still] carry out a precious malevolent role in supporting decimating families, emboldening sodomites and rejecting 2000 years of Church teaching, starting from Christian initiation, through welcoming communities perverts of whatever variety. What is asked demanded of these, today even more than yesterday, in complex as well as mundane all situations, is to support parents clericalist faggots in their educative fascist undertaking, accompanying corrupting children and young people in their growth through personalized paths "friendships" capable of introducing violating them to the full meaning extent of life iniquity and [thus] encouraging choices grave sin and responsibilities despair, lived in the light of the Gospel Liberace.
Conclusion
58. The reflections homoheresies put forward, the fruit of the Synodal dialog monologue that took place in great freedom secrecy and a spirit of reciprocal listening insatiable faggotry, are intended to raise questions militate against Church dogma and indicate perspectives encourage disobedience that will have to be matured fostered and made clearer more obscure by the reflection stoolies, "useful idiots" and pewsitter parasites of the local Churches chanceries in the year that separates us from the Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of bishops Faggots planned for October 2015. These are not decisions that have been made nor simply points of view. All the same the collegial Machiavellian path of the bishops and the involvement of all God's people apostates under the guidance of the Holy Preternatural Spirit will lead us to find roads of truth and mercy to Hell for all. This is the wish deception that from the beginning of our work Pope Francis has extended to us enabled and enforced, inviting us to the courage of apostasize from the faith and the humble and honest to welcome of the truth in charity faggotry.
MID-TERM REPORT REGARDING THE EXTRAORDINARY SYNOD ON THE FAMILY AS EXPRESSED BY A GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF EXTRAORDINARY FAGGOTS: ANNOTATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS FOR YOUR EDIFICATION
21 comments:
Thank you for this! I don't know whether to laugh or cry, but it is the truth. It is always the highlight of my day whenever you post!
Thanks, Boniface. I hope that you laugh more than cry.
Excellent.... and now another homobishop from Newfoundland has just revealed his sodophilia inclinations....
Thank you for bringing a lighter side (!) to the horror which we are witnessing.
Viva Cristo Rey!
Dear Heresy Hunter,
We are with you in the righteousness of your beliefs, as they absolutely adhere to doctrine: a fight I am personally involved in.
However, the slandering and hateful language used to offend our brothers and sisters who struggle with the sin of homosexuality is unkind, unloving, and anti-Christian.
The derogatory "f" word used in this article does NOT appear in Scriptures.
Those people you refer to as "f*****s" are Christ's beloved children who He Died for.
Remember: we are ALL sinners.
PLEASE, I respectfully ask you to reconsider the language used. We do not want Our Loving God to be associated with what He never Proclaimed. Such slander throws mud on the Blessed Trinity and will make those who have already created a false perception of a "hateful" God, angrily run further away from Him.
All that hatred will be reversed onto innocent souls and more injustice will be spread.
This is only a suggestion.
Thank you and God Bless ~
+ + + Joseph C. + + +
The "hateful" canard does not work here.
Well, I guess psychotherapy is needed as what we are now witnessing in Rome is psychotic. It is going to get worse in the months to come, much more worse.
Father Alphonse de Valk, C.S.B., started issuing warnings about the homosexual stranglehold on the Church 40 years ago. At first, some of us found it hard to believe that 2% of the population could constitute a serious threat. Well, he was right and we were wrong. He had probably seen a lot from the inside that the rest of us could not see from the outside. The insolent tone of the relatio shows that homosexual activists believe they can conquer the Bride of Christ. They knew the relatio would be opposed, but the fact that they were able to publish it at all proves they occupy strategic positions. As long as the cardinals keep talking about "loving" and "welcoming" homosexuals, we are lost. And you are right that there is something insane about what we have just witnessed in Rome -- not just disturbing, or evil, or wrong -- but actually insane.
Let's not forget our brothers ands sisters struggling with the sin of bestiality. While none of us likes to hear about kittens being abused , do we really need to hear bad words that describe the character of men who are mounting Mittens the kitten; do we want to hear them described as feline feckers?
Really, words are much worse than actions and if you do not cease these wounding words M.J. will likely stop reading this blog in another score of years or so....
In 1961, the Congregation for Religious, published a document "Religiosorum Institutio". This document had to do with proper preparation, of those seeking ordination. Clearly, in the 1950s, there were some serious quality control problems, in our seminaries and houses of Religious formation, or there would not have been any need to publish this document. One thing is quite clear when you read this piece........... .......Homosexuals are not to be ordained......... Clearly, this directive has been, largely, ignored by bishops and those responsible for seminary oversight. Among the homosexuals ordained, have been some real hebephile and ephebophile monsters, responsible for 80-85% of the abuse cases. In 1990/91, I remember chatting with a fellow teacher, who told me that he had just had a conversation with a priest friend of his. This priest told him, point blank, that about 40% of the clergy in this priest's diocese were homosexual. I was shocked and didn't believe it. In lieu, of all these abuse cases and the approval, that so many bishops (the majority) gave to those inserted paragraphs, in the mid-term report, at the recent synod, perhaps that priest's assertion, was true after all. Any wonder why some people use terms like lavender mafia or homo mafia, and believe that the Catholic priesthood is infested with homosexuals. Welcome, to the Catholic Church, in the age of Aquarius.
Yes, infested is a good word to use. I would say that the number is even greater than 40% in some dioceses.
To confirm your reference ro the RI: "Advancement to religious vows and ordination should be barred to those who are afflicted with the evil tendencies to homosexuality or pederasty, since for them the common life and the priestly ministry would constitute serious danger."
From: "Careful Selection and Training of Candidates for the States of Perfection and Sacred Orders", Religiosorum Institutio, Congregation for Religious, February 2, 1961, 30(4).
I addressed the homoheresy in a couple of posts earlier this year, with focus on the Diocese of London, at the following link:
http://heresy-hunter.blogspot.ca/2014/05/homoheresy-inside-can-church-part-2.html
Why not?
A whimsical, solipsistic papacy emboldening and empowering the dictatorship of relativism. In due course, the dictatorship will devolve into a tyranny that will ruthlessly victimize and brutally deprive the faithful few. Vendee; learn this word. The Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary are both a source of strength and a place of refuge. Dieu est le Roi!
AMEN + + +
There is no compassion for the sinner, here. Such language does not belong to Christ Jesus. I wonder if this person is trying to foment hatred towards the "traditionalists", for it seems too extreme to be conceived by a heart which loves Our Lord Jesus Christ.
You may do as you wilt. Can you even imagine Jesus Christ using such profanity when referring to His beloved sinners?
Paul To the hard of hearing you rhetorically yell and to the nearly blind you rhetorically paint with bright bold colors and to those like you, PFFFFT
Men don't cotton to other men acting like Miss Grundy, so, speaking just for M.J. piss off
Your smugness and self-righteousness is getting annoying. May I suggest to you the Patheos "Catholic" blogs - they are very sensitive to feelings over there, using acceptable, non-judgemental words like "gay", and will make you feel very good about yourself and affirm your moral superiority over others.
TH2: to spread the Gospel with such language is to make the Word a weapon. Common sense suggests that by using certain terms, we can convey a hateful and judgmental message rather than the Truth.
To write "Synod of Bishops Faggots", or "Jesuit trained priest faggot", or "how many people faggot clergy..." is to condemn and humiliate our brothers and sisters.
You are not judging the sin, but the sinner.
I call on your ability to reason in the light of God by taking down this abhorrent article for the sake of Our Lord, Jesus Christ +
God Bless you, and happy new year.
P.J.
I WAS blind, indeed. I initially thought this page belonged to a Catholic person. But thanks to your reply (as well as the author's) and considering the immutably insufferable sentiment held towards other human beings, it is now clear that the author of this page is not a Christian. Rather, it seems more logical to call this page a set up from an anti-christian group which desires to foment further violence towards the Christians through the warped portrait of an evil Christianity - as if such perception was not widespread already. This goes for those commentators who defend this anti-gospel.
Simple logic tells us that the inciting of such hatred is most contrary to the worship of a Christ who, He Himself, Was Condemned by the same.
We are not worthy, Paul. You are THE best Christian ever- EVA - ever
hehe my my what a cheeky monkey
Post a Comment