02 May 2015


The Apostate Michael Coren is now publicly commenting that he has been attending Anglican services for approximately one year. For Catholics monitoring his writings over the last couple of years of so, his apostasy has been self-evident and, really, there should be no surprise at his recent public pronouncement.

He who has ears to hear, let him hear: Corenocopia = Corenocrapia.

Sidebar: public apostasy incurs automatic excommunication (Canon 1364).

Bye bye.

However, what has been lost in all of this is the following: over the course of one year, word must have gotten out. How could the betrayal of a widely known "Catholic" remain hidden for so long? Surely, news of the apostasy must have spread amongst Establishment church ranks, that their very own Neo-Catholic demagogic diva had formally jumped ship. Why, then, was it not reported earlier? Given the Apostate Coren's public prominence as a Canadian "Catholic" commentator and broadcaster, let alone all his connections with the Catholic glitterati, should they have not immediately reported (i.e. warned) the laity? During the course of the past year, Coren - in true parasitical Neo-Catholic style - was raking in the money from his dilettante speaking engagements, doing the lecture circuit at parishes, Catholic groups, organizations, etc. Why no word from the Toronto Diocese? How could it not have known? Is it because chancery office faggots are squealing with joy at Coren's pro-sodomy promulgations? Why did not any of the darlings at the Catholic Register report on it soonafter? And, yes, even perhaps anyone at Catholic Insight or The Interim?

Their silence is itself the answer. To paraphrase what I recently wrote in the com boxes at another blog: Regardless of whether they come across as conservative, traditional or progressive Catholics, "left" or "right" or "moderate" or whatever, they are all "friends" with one another. They affirm one another, justify one anothers errors and heresies, watch out for each others backs - driven by the desire for prestige, career advancement and/or acceptance.

Don't want to spill the Pellegrino!

Canadian Catholics - go elsewhere for reliable Catholic news and views. Do not trust anything that the representatives CanChurch speak or write. Do not be charmed, do not be dazzled by their intellectual acrobatics and, most especially, do not succumb to their sappy, emasculating sentimentalisms.

Given the unprecedented crisis in the Catholic Church, now exploding with the Modernist/Marxist papacy of Pope Francis, it is now time to "click" off switch. It is time to cut the rope. Let them sink.


28 April 2015


Reported here:

"After the farce, comes the tragedy" - Heinrich Heine on Kant's second Critique of Reason


21 February 2015


Once upon a time after Vatican II, bishops, priests and their lackeys in the "official" Catholic media remained silent when the Faithful were attacked by the wolves, sometimes unknowingly facilitating the actions of these wolves, oftentimes covertly supporting these wolves. Now, five decades on, several of these clerics have become full-blown wolves themselves, openly and unashamedly attacking the Faithful, calling that which is good "evil", and transmogrifying that which is evil into "good"...

For Canadian Catholic bloggers, a good proportion of them tending toward orthodoxy and who regularly monitor the deplorable state of widespread apostasy in this nation's Establishment Church, it is common knowledge that Father Thomas Rosica is a power hungry Modernist. The public face is one of a humble and hard-working orthodox cleric, but outbursts and vilifications in response to articles on the internet from Traditionally-minded Catholics betray a hard and fast Progressive agenda at odds with the Magisterium. The same viewpoint, I gather,  applies to other Canadian Catholics of orthodox bent who, while not expressing their viewpoints online for whatever reason, may have had misfortune to transact or communicate with this ladder climbing clericalist.

Fr. Roscia has his hand in every pie throughout the Canadian Catholic landscape - diocesan newspapers, universities, secular media outlets, WYD Toronto, the CCCB, chanceries, advising, writing, lecturing, hosting Church-related events, winner of numerous awards, etc. He is all over the place, a prominent public figure who has lately gone trans-Atlantic, soaring to the very top. Since Pope Francis' election, Rosica has been appointed as - another notch in his long list of accomplishments - English language spokesman for the Vatican Press Office. Or, as I prefer to say in this time of diabolical disorientation in Rome, Fr. Federico Lombardi's pool boy.

So, to demonstrate my solidarity with blogger Mr. David Domet (aka Vox Cantoris), after the threat of lawsuit he received from Fr. Rosica, demanding that posts critical of his public statements removed - even reserving the right to litigate against Mr. Domet "regardless of an apology or retraction"! - this blogger provides various links to his own articles critical of Fr. Rosica's public statements and actions.

So far as I am aware, the reader would be well to note that it is unprecedented for a Vatican official to commence civil legal action against a Catholic layman critical of  the hierarchy. Fr. Rosica is a big time player with many influential "friends", so in all likelihood he consulted with certain individuals at the Vatican before commencing legal action so as intimidate a Catholic blogger into silence. Accordingly, it is not hard to deduce that Rome has declared war on Catholic bloggers - and here we have "the Francis Effect" manifesting in true form.

Below there is a cornucopia of well-referenced articles  (starting in 2010) available for perusal: Rosica's vilification of LifeSite News during the Kennedy funeral affair, his gushing interview with the excommunicated ex-priest Greg Baum, his swooning endorsement and collaboration with liberal Vaticanista John Allen, Jr., his function as mouthpiece for the apostatic Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, including machinations occurrent  at the Salt+Light Media Foundation (of which he is CEO), Catholic-lite par excellence - but most importantly for the current context, Fr. Rosica's views on the role of lay Catholics on the Internet.

Posts devoted entirely to Fr. Rosica public words/actions are these:

Posts with just a few paragraphs critical of Fr. Rosica are these:


07 January 2015



04 January 2015


To all you awesome neo-Catholic ladies at Patheos, the National Catholic Register and other such sites doling out how cool and sexy it is to be a Catholic woman...

Apologies. Please excuse me. Instead, I meant this...

From me to you,

Love, TH2  xxx ooo


16 October 2014


Synod14 - Eleventh General Assembly: "Relatio post disceptationem" of the General Rapporteur, Card. Péter Erdo, 13.10.2014


[Unofficial translation clarification]


1. During the prayer vigil held in St Peter's Square on 4 October 2014 in preparation for the Synod on the family, Pope Francis [aka "the South American Scourge of God"] evoked the centrality of the experience of family Modernism in all lives, in a simple and concrete deplorable manner: 

Evening Apostasy falls on our assembly. It is the hour at which one willingly returns home to meet at the same table the Gates of Hell, in the depth[s] of affection pride, of the good wickedness that has been done and received, of the encounters which warm harden the heart and make it grow [cold], good wine which hastens the unending feast orgy in the days of man [minus recourse to the Magisterium/Tradition]. It is also the weightiest hour for one who the unrepentant Sodomite in the Church who finds himself face to face with his own loneliness depravity, in the bitter twilight of shattered dreams and broken plans and old age, invigorated only fleetingly with  vague remembrances of the glorious Council from 1962 to 1965; how many people faggot clergy trudge through the day in the blind alley of resignation, of abandonment, even resentment: in in how many homes rectories the wine of joy supply of young boys has been less plentiful, and therefore, also the zest — the very wisdom inclination — for life abomination ... Let us make our prayer defiance heard for one another this evening, [feigning it as] a prayer for all.
2. The source of joys sorrows and trials, of deep affections concern and relations frustration – at times wounded unbearable – the family is truly a "school of humanity" ("Familia schola quaedam uberioris humanitatis est", Vatican Council II, Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, Gaudium et Spes, 52) believed by the Church to be a reflection of the so-called Trinity, of which we are in great need [to eradicate]. Despite the many [promising] signs of crisis in the institution of the family in various contexts of the "global village" godless secularism, the desire for family remains alive [unfortunately], especially among the young, and is at the root of the Church's our need to proclaim tirelessly and with profound conviction the "Gospel of the family Sexual Nihilism" entrusted to her us with the revelation of God's love Satan's hatred for Jesus Christ.

3. The Bishop of Rome [a vulgar, heretical Jesuit with Peronist predispositions and a penchant for Liberation Theology] called upon the Synod of Bishops Faggots to reflect upon the situation its ongoing decimation of the family, decisive and valuable heart wrenching, in its Extraordinary General Assembly of [Faggots on] October 2014, a reflection decimation which will then be pursued in greater depth in the Ordinary General Assembly [of Faggots] scheduled to take place in October 2015, as well as during the full intervening year[s] between 2016 two synodal events the present and the Anti-Christ's arrival:

The convenire in unum around the Bishop of Rome is already an event of grace chastisement, in which episcopal collegiality faggotry is made manifest in a path of spiritual and pastoral discernment perversity expressed in subtlized, flowery language tailored especially for chancery office faggots everywhere.
Thus Pope Francis described the synodal experience, indicating its tasks in the dual process of listening to the signs of defying God and mankind ignoring Church history, and in the resulting dual and unique fidelity Schism.

4. In the light [dark shadows] of the same discourse [done in secret, censored, barring any rightful observation from the Faithful] we have gathered together the results of our [sodomy-driven] reflections and our [emasculated] dialogues in the following three parts redundancies: listening, to look at the situation of the family sodomites/pederasts in the Church today, in the complexity of its light and shade their power and influence; looking, our gaze fixed on Christ Satan, to re-evaluate refute with renewed freshness and enthusiasm ferocity what the [purported] revelation transmitted in the faith of the Church tells us about the beauty and dignity of the famility abomination of the sodomitical lifestyle; and discussion in the light of the Lord Jesus Lucifer to discern the ways in which the Church and society can renew their commitment to the family be manipulated so as to deem our licentiousness as normal and good. 


Dissimulating: the context and challenges to [destroying] the family

The socio-cultural sodomitical context

5. Anthropological and cultural change today influences A once nascent Modernism in the Pre-Conciliar Church now, in this wonderful post-Conciliar Age, impacts all aspects of life and requires an analytic and a diversified approach, able to discern instill the positive forms interpretations of individual freedom sexual degeneracy. It is necessary to be aware of the growing danger represented by an exasperated individualism Traditional Catholicism that distorts upholds family bonds and ends up considering each component of the family as an isolated unit a reflection of the Holy Family, leading in some all cases to the prevalence of an idea of the subject formed according to his or her own wishes the teachings of the Magisterium and Holy Scripture, which are assumed as absolute .


The relevance dominance of emotional life [and feelings]

9. Faced with the social Modernist-contrived framework outlined above, a greater need is encountered among individuals apostates and sodomites to take care of themselves, to know their inner being Oprah, and to live in greater harmony with succumb to their emotions and sentiments, seeking a relational neurotic quality in emotional life. In the same way, it is possible to encounter a widespread desire for family transgressing dogma accompanied by the search for the divination of oneself. But how can this attention to the care for oneself pretended obedience to God be cultivated and maintained, alongside this desire for family the unrestricted autonomy of the self? This is a great challenge for the Church too since Vatican II when the heresies of Kung, Rahner, Schillebeeckx, Curran, Courtney-Murray, Gutierrez, Baum, Lonergan, Teilhard et allia gained in influence. The danger[s] of individualism Natural Law and the risk of living selfishly chastely are significant.

10. Today's world appears to promote[s] limitless affectivity immorality, seeking to explore exploit all its aspects, including the most complex sodomy. Indeed, the question of emotional fragility concocted victimhood is very current: a narcissistic, unstable or changeable affectivity faggotry do[es] not always help greater maturity to be reached. In this context, couples faggot priests and lesbian nuns are often uncertain and hesitant, struggling to find ways to grow camouflage their abominations from the Faithful...



The gaze upon Christ Satan: the Gospel of the Family Modernism

The gaze upon Jesus Satan and gradualness in the history of salvation uprooting dogma

12. In order to:

walk among contemporary challenges tear Tradition asunder, the decisive condition is to maintain a fixed gaze on Jesus Christ Man, to pause in contemplation and in adoration of His Face the Self... Indeed, every time we return to the source of the Christian experience Marxism and Freemasonry, new paths and undreamed of possibilities open up" (Pope Francis, Address of 4 October 2014).

Jesus looked upon the women and the men [notice prioritization of women over men] he met with love and tenderness, accompanying their steps with patience and mercy, in proclaiming the demands of the Kingdom of God [as promulgated by the Church, of which we are venturing to terminate]

13. From the moment that the order of creation is determined by orientation towards Christ Man, it becomes necessary to distinguish without separating the relativize various levels through which God communicates the grace of the covenant to humanity His Catholic Church. Through the law of gradualness (cf. Familiaris Consortio, 34), typical of divine demonic pedagogy, this means interpreting the nuptial covenant sex exclusively in terms of continuity sensation and novelty self-absorption, [not] in the order of creation Natural Law, and nor in that of redemption.



The discussion: pastoral perspectives redundancies

Proclaiming the Gospel of the family Sexual Nihilism today, in various contexts

24. The Synod dialog monologue has allowed an agreement a diktat on some of the more urgent pastoral needs sodomitical fantasies to be entrusted to being made concrete in the individual local Churches chanceries/dioceses, in communion cum Petro Diabolus et sub Petro Diabolus.

25. The announcement of the Gospel of the family Sexual Nihilism is an urgent issue for the new evangelization faggotization. The Church Synod of Faggots has to carry this out with the tenderness of a mother pink poodle and the clarity of a teacher (cf. Eph 4,15), in fidelity to the merciful kenosi krapology of Christ Kasper. The truth is incarnated in human fragility sodomy not to condemn it, but to cure celebrate it.

26. Evangelizing Faggotizing is the shared responsibility of all God's people Satan's minions, each according to his or her own ministry and charism carnal preferences. Without the joyous testimony of spouses and families heretics everywhere, the announcement, even if correct, risks being misunderstood or submerged exposed by the ocean of words that is a characteristic of our society the Catholic blogosphere  (cf. Novo Millennio Ineunte, 50). On various occasions the Synodal Fathers Faggots underlined that [all] Catholic[s] families are called upon themselves to be the active subjects revolutionaries of all the pastoral of the family sexual nihilism.


44. As regards matrimonial suits [annulments], the speeding-up of the procedure, requested demanded by many [apostatic/non-practicing Catholics], as well as the preparation of a sufficient number of operators, clerics and lay people heretical chancery bureaucrats, dedicating obsessing themselves to this, requires an increase in the responsibilities emasculation and feminization of the diocesan bishop, who in his diocese might charge a specially Jesuit trained priest faggot who would be able to offer throw the parties advice celebrating on the validity of their [homo]marriage.

45. Divorced people who have not remarried should be invited to find in the Eucharist the nourishment they need to sustain them in their state [regardless if they are in a state of mortal sin and have not gone to Confession in decades]. The local community and pastors have to accompany shower these people with solicitude platitudes, particularly when there are children involved or they if the husband find[s] themselves himself in a serious situation of poverty [because in the settlement the man-hating, lesbian judge awarded most assets/money to the unfaithful wife].

46. In the same way the situation of the divorced who have remarried adulterers demands a careful discernment dumbing down of dogma and an accompaniment full of respect flattery and ego-feeding, avoiding any language or behavior that might make them feel discriminated against insulted by the dogmas of the Church and the straightforward words of Jesus Christ. For the Christian community looking after admonishing them is not a weakening of its faith and its testimony to the indissolubility of marriage spiritual work of mercy as taught by the Church, but rather it expresses precisely its [lack of] charity in its caring legalism.

47. As regards the possibility entitlement mentality of partaking of the sacraments of Penance and the Eucharist, some argued in favor of the present regulations because of their theological foundation, others [i.e. faggot bishops and those sympathetic thereof] were in favor of a greater opening on very precise dispensing with all proscriptions when dealing with situations that cannot be resolved without creating new injustices and suffering forms of victimhood...


Welcoming homosexual persons faggots/pederasts

50. Homosexuals Sodomites have gifts and qualities to offer to the Christian community [e.g. penile anal penetration and other sundry forms of masturbatory entertainment, obsession for young boys, sadomasochism, narcissism, promiscuity, compulsion, fashion design, interior decorating, "gay porn", high rates of drug use, depression, alcoholism, suicide, shortened life spans]
: are we capable of welcoming endorsing these people behaviours, guaranteeing to them a fraternal space unrepentant faggots free reign to commit their abominations in our communities [and parishes]? Often they wish demand to encounter a Church that offers them a welcoming non-judgmental home [otherwise they take the matter to court, win judgement, garnering much money]. Are our communities capable of providing that, accepting and valuing their sexual orientation perversion, without by compromising Catholic doctrine on the family and matrimony?

51. The question of homosexuality sodomitical behaviour and its permutations leads to a serious reflection skullduggery on how to elaborate realistic justify and facilitate paths of affective growth licentiousness and human hedonism and evangelical maturity integrating the sexual dimension license: it appears therefore as an important educative disinformation challenge. The Church Synod of Faggots furthermore affirms that unions penile anal penetration, fellatio, etc. between people of the same sex sodomites/pederasts and lesbians cannot be considered on the same footing as matrimony between man and woman. Nor is it [is] acceptable that [unmitigated, dictatorial] pressure be brought to bear on pastors or that international bodies [Socialist, anti-Catholic, e.g. Caritas Internationalis, Development and Peace, CCHD] make financial aid dependent on the introduction of regulations inspired by gender ideology feminism and "queer theory" [i.e. Marxism custom-made for lesbians and faggots, respectively].
52. Without By denying the moral problems connected to homosexual unions "sins which cry out to Heaven for vengeance" it has to be noted falsely insisted that there are cases in which mutual aid to the point of sacrifice constitutes a precious celebratory support in the life depravities of the partners unrepentant sodomites and faggotry in general. Furthermore, the Church Synod of Faggots pays special attention to the [likely-to-be-sexually/psychologically-abused] children who live with couples of the same sex sodomite/lesbian "parents", emphasizing that the needs and rights of the little ones must always be given priority subsumed by abominable desires.


The challenge of education dogmatic eradication and the role of the family faggotry in evangelization

56. The fundamental challenge facing families sodomitical cardinals, bishops, priests and chancery office personnel today is undoubtedly that of education Traditional Catholics, rendered more difficult and complex by today's cultural reality social media,  i.e. the internet. What have to be considered are the needs and expectations of families our unwitting accomplices, namely the Neo-Catholics, who are capable of testifying in daily life, places of growth, of concrete and essential transmission of on the virtues Protestantism that provide[s] vast income form for our their existence.

57. In this [quandary], Church the Synod of Faggots can [still] carry out a precious malevolent role in supporting decimating families, emboldening sodomites and rejecting 2000 years of Church teaching, starting from Christian initiation, through welcoming communities perverts of whatever variety. What is asked demanded of these, today even more than yesterday, in complex as well as mundane all situations, is to support parents clericalist faggots in their educative fascist undertaking, accompanying corrupting children and young people in their growth through personalized paths "friendships" capable of introducing violating them to the full meaning extent of life iniquity and [thus] encouraging choices grave sin and responsibilities despair, lived in the light of the Gospel Liberace.


58. The reflections homoheresies put forward, the fruit of the Synodal dialog monologue that took place in great freedom secrecy and a spirit of reciprocal listening insatiable faggotry, are intended to raise questions militate against Church dogma and indicate perspectives encourage disobedience that will have to be matured fostered and made clearer more obscure by the reflection stoolies, "useful idiots" and pewsitter parasites of the local Churches chanceries in the year that separates us from the Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of bishops Faggots planned for October 2015. These are not decisions that have been made nor simply points of view. All the same the collegial Machiavellian path of the bishops and the involvement of all God's people apostates under the guidance of the Holy Preternatural Spirit will lead us to find roads of truth and mercy to Hell for all. This is the wish deception that from the beginning of our work Pope Francis has extended to us enabled and enforced, inviting us to the courage of apostasize from the faith and the humble and honest to welcome of the truth in charity faggotry.


06 September 2014


Proselytism is solemn nonsense, it makes no sense. We need to get to know each other, listen to each other and improve our knowledge of the world around us... This is important: to get to know people, listen, expand the circle of ideas.
                       Pope Francis (interview w/Eugenio Scalfari, La Repubblica, 1 October 2013)

Martyrdom of SS. Gabriel Lalemant and Jean de Brebeuf in 1649.

You see, ladies and gentlemen - look what happened to SS. Gabriel Lalemant and Jean de Brebeuf, those so-called "North American Martyrs", after they proselytized to the genteel Iroquois. They were tortured, stoned, scalped, mutilated with knives, their necks seared with "red hot" tomahawk collars, they received mock baptisms with boiling water, then burned at the stake. Good grief. You don't want this to happen to you, do you? Who were they to judge? Those stupid saints, they deserved to be slaughtered. Who cares that these "ideological Christians" were the vanguard of Catholics to spark the Faith in Canada, eventually to spread throughout North America. Why were they so critical of Indian paganism? It was "solemn nonsense" that they attempted to convert those noble savages. What a waste of time. Too bad Francis was not around in the seventeenth century. Otherwise, Gabe and Jean would have gotten to know the Iroquois, listened to them, then expanded the circle of their ideas. "Solemn nonsense" was Christ's command: "you, therefore, must go out, making disciples of all nations, and baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, teaching them to observe all the commandments which I have given you" (Matthew 28:19-20).

And what about this miserable "old maid"...
St. Teresa Benedicta (1891-1942)

Look at her - a "sourpuss", a "long-faced, mournful funeral Christian". That expression does not convey gravitas, of someone in deep mystical union with Christ, but - as Pope Francis tells us - just of a "religious [with] a heart as sour as vinegar". Who cares that St. Teresa was intellectually brilliant, a philosopher, doing her doctoral dissertation under the German phenomenologist Edmund Husserl. She dropped it all, including her Jewish religion, converted to Catholicism, then became a Carmelite nun. She even wrote an insipid book called Studies on John of the Cross: The Science of the Cross. Hilarious! And what did all of these eventually get her? Murdered in a gas chamber at a Nazi concentration camp. What a "sad Christian", what a "querulous and disillusioned pessimist", one of those "people without light  - real downers". Just another stupid saint.

Then there is St. Thérèse of Liseux, the so-called "Little Flower". Look at this corny, over-the-top image of the child Thérèse in prayer whilst on her mummy's lap...
That is so phoney and ridiculous. Instead, we should listen to Pope Francis so as to shun such portrayals of hypocrisy and inauthenticity. As he said: "they disguise themselves as good people: they make themselves up like little holy cards, looking up at heaven as they pray, making sure they are seen - they believe they are more righteous than others, they despise others". That's right, Holy Father, those Catholics hate everyone. Thank you for affirming aloud a thought that was running through my head for years. Now look below, even more of this idealized "little holy card" posturing by the "Little Flower"...
St. Thérèse Liseux (1873-1897)

What a stupid saint. Pope Francis smartly counsels us against such Catholic romanticism by reference to a discredited psychologist and charlatan: "Sigmund Freud used to say... that in every idealisation there is an attack". Awesome stuff, Holy Father, you must be reading Ron Rolheiser. And lest us not forget St. Therese's parents...
Bl. Marie-Azélie Martin (1832-1877) and Bl. Louis Martin (1823-1894)

Clearly, what we have here is "Mr. and Mrs. Whiner". Imagine those two at a party? How depressing. Wonder what the topic of conversation would have been? Devotion to the Sacred Heart? Proper protocol when confessing sins to a priest? Meatless Fridays? That they had five daughters who were all nuns? Too bad Zélie was not more outgoing, that she was so "afraid to dance, to cry, afraid of everything". Ah, the fun that would have been had, because she was so darn cute. Look closely, at her faux couture clothing, at her hair tightened into a constricting bun. Symbolic, yes? Of what, you ask? Answer: of her inwardist psychological repression desperately seeking relief. Notice that combined distressed goddess/naughty librarian look about her, which I find to be so magnetic, so sexy, so delicious. Nonetheless, thank goodness for His Holiness in that he warns us enlightened moderns that such "older people [were] nostalgic for structures and customs which are no longer life-giving in today’s world". We do not want that. Thus, with such profound Peronist insights we can confidently infer that Louis and Zélie were "starched Christians, too polite, who speak of theology calmly over tea". Borrrrrriiiinnnngggggg. Avoid such Catholics at all costs.

Here is yet another one of those stupid saints who "make themselves up like little holy cards, looking up at heaven as they pray". May I introduce to you...
St. Jean Marie Baptiste Vianney, the Curé D'Ars (1786-1859)

Ever read a hagiography on this buffoon? What pious baloney. Allegedly, his diet regimen consisted of only a potato a day and he regularly suffered from physical attacks by the Devil. He spent up to 18 hours per day in the confessional. Moreover, Vianney refused to give absolution if the penitent did not stop dancing when at the local tavern! What a "rigid Christian", "afraid to dance, to cry, afraid of everything". Using the Holy Father's most excellent example, we must remember that dance forms an important component of the liturgy, especially The Tango. Who cares that Vianney was responsible for thousands upon thousands of French Catholics returning to the Faith after the French Revolution's devastating assault upon the Catholic Church. Who cares that thousands of pilgrims from around the globe came to see him. Who cares that he performed miracles, or that he healed the sick, or that he could read souls instantaneously, or that he possessed Heaven-infused knowledge of the past and future. Look at him now, he's a "museum mummy"...
Now we come to perhaps the most stupidest type of saint in the litany of saints - that is, the "Rosary-bead counters". Perhaps the most famous of these types in recent times was Padre Pio...
St. Pio of Pietrelcina (1887-1968)

Often, did he recount the count of his beads. For example, "Today I said 32 or 33 rosaries. Maybe 1 or 2 more". Is that not funny? I want to laugh uproariously whenever reading such infantilism. But as Pope Francis wisely tells us, "it is not to laugh at". It's more than acceptable - indeed, it is laudatory -  in today's antinomian post-Conciliar climate to be smugly dismissive, condescending or insulting to those plebeian Catholics with their quaint devotions to the Most Holy Mother God.

So, then: to all you papalotrers, ultramontanists and Vatican II cultists out there, to all my beloved excuse mongers and deniers of the obvious and ignorers of the elephant in the room, to all you smiley face salesmen apologists and social justice Marxists, to all you pewsitter parasites populating the Magic Circle, hear me now: Let us never ever disremember those most sacred, dogmatic, Magisterial, Holy Spirit inspirited words of our pope:
The most serious of the evils that afflict the world these days are youth unemployment and the loneliness of the old... This, to me, is the most urgent problem that the Church is facing.
Amen. Amen.

 Viva la revolución !

H/T The Pope Francis Little Book of Insults